When Does One Basically Need To Contact A Law Firm To Avail Of Some Services?

When you are an American law student, the first thing you will always have to learn about is the basics of civil and criminal law and the differences they both have against each other. Technically, the integral difference between the two kinds of laws is their ways on how they are supposed to punish the criminals who have been proven guilty. Basically, if a defendant or a respondent in a civil court trial will lose and has been proven guilty, he or she is supposed to be mandated to pay a certain amount of money or cash for the damages done. But with criminal law, if a defendant will be proven guilty and loses the case at the court trial, he will then be mandated to pay a certain amount of money and spend an amount or a designated time duration behind the prison walls. Technically, if you are a defendant in a civil type of case or trial and have been proven guilty, you are not mandated to serve a few years in jail or in the prison cell. Check out  http://zaneslaw.com/phoenix-personal-injury-attorneys/phoenix-slip-and-fall-attorney/ to get started.

The reason why they do not let criminals of civil cases stay behind the bars is that they never really committed an actual crime. And usually, on these types of cases, the party proved guilty only got a bit away from the law because of clumsiness or negligence in his part. A good example would be a guy who may have just gotten his sight and focus on the road for a few moments and then suddenly hits a car. Although he obviously did a mistake that caused damages to the other party, he never did it on purpose or of his own will. With that being said, if the person sitting inside the car was badly hurt with some injuries due to the crash the other party made, he is allowed to file a lawsuit against the other guy. Visit link for more info.

A direct versus an indirect negligence that caused the damage

Car accidents are basically one of those good examples to what a direct negligence is like since obviously, one party is solely reliable for the crash and the damage that was done. But there may also be other cases, which also happens commonly, wherein the respondent was not really directly responsible or reliable for the other party's injury.